|
Texts
in English in chronological order (With Deirdre (With Deirdre (With Deirdre Understanding
verbal understanding. (In Jean Khalfa (ed.) What is Intelligence?Cambridge
University Press (1994), 179-198.) How
do we communicate?
(In John Brockman & Katinka Matson (eds) How things are: A science
toolkit for the mind. Sperber, Dan, Francesco Cara,
& Vittorio Girotto (1995). Relevance
Theory explains the Selection Task. Cognition 57, 31-95. Why are perfect animals, hybrids, and monsters food for symbolic thought? (A historical curiosity - if that - published in Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 8-2, (1996) 143-169. Revised (in 1980) English version of "Pourquoi les animaux parfaits, les hybrides et les monstres sont-ils bons à penser symboliquement?", L'Homme, XV (2) (1975) 5-24). (with Deirdre Author's
presentation of Explaining Culture (Unpublished - Written for a web list at the
time, 1996). Methodological individualism and cognitivism in the social sciences (Unpublished English version of Individualisme méthodologique et cognitivisme. (Dans: R. Boudon, F. Chazel & A. Bouvier (eds.) Cognition et sciences sociales. Paris: Presse Universitaires de France. (1997) 123-136.) Intuitive and reflective beliefs. In Mind and Language 12 (1)
(1997). 67-83. (with Deirdre (with Deirdre (with Deirdre (with Deirdre (With Metarepresentations
in an evolutionary perspective (in Dan Sperber ed. Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary
Perspective. Oxford University Press, 2000, pp.117-137). An
objection to the memetic approach to culture (in Robert Aunger ed. Darwinizing
Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science. (With Gloria Origgi) Evolution, communication, and the proper function of language (A discussion of Millikan in the
light of pragmatics and of the psychology of mindreading, in Peter Carruthers
and Andrew Chamberlain eds., Evolution and the Human Mind: Language,
Modularity and Social Cognition. Conceptual
tools for a natural science of society and culture (Radcliffe-Brown Lecture in
Social Anthopology 1999 - Proceedings of the British Academy, 2001, 111, 297-317) In
Defense of massive modularity (in Dupoux, E. Language, Brain and Cognitive Development:
Essays in Honor of Jacques Mehler. 2002, (With Vittorio Girotto, Markus Kemmelmeir and Jean-Baptiste Van der Henst) Inept
reasoners or pragmatic virtuosos? Relevance and the deontic selection task. (Cognition 2001, 81, B69-B76) (in PDF format) An
Evolutionary perspective on testimony and argumentation. Philosophical Topics. (2001). 29.
401-413 (With Jean-Baptiste Van der Henst and Guy Politzer) When is a conclusion worth deriving? A relevance-based analysis of
indeterminate relational problems. (Thinking & Reasoning , 2002, 8 (1) 1-20) The future of writing (contribution to the virtual symposium text-e, 2002) (With Deirdre (With Deirdre (With Jean-Baptiste Van der Henst and Laure Carles) Truthfulness and relevance in
telling the time
(Mind and Language, vol 17, No 5, November 2002, pp 457-466.) (With Maurice Bloch) Kinship
and evolved psychological dispositions: The Mother's Brother controversy
reconsidered Current Anthropology. 2002. 43 (4) 723-748. (With Vittorio
Girotto) Use or misuse of the selection task? Rejoinder to
Fiddick, Cosmides, and Tooby. Cognition (2002) 85 (3),
277-290 (With
Vittorio Girotto) Does the Selection
task detect cheater detection? (in Fitness, J. & Sterelny, K. (Eds.),
(2003) From Mating to Mentality: Evaluating Evolutionary Psychology,
Monographs in Cognitive Science, Psychology Press. (PDF file) (With Deirdre (With (With Ira Noveck) Introduction. in Noveck, I. & Sperber, D. (eds) Experimental
Pragmatics, Palgrave (2004) (With Jean-Baptiste Van der Henst) Testing the
cognitive and communicative principles of relevance Why rethink interdisciplinarity?
Translation of the preceding. Text discussed in the virtual seminar "Rethinking
interdisciplinarity" on www.interdisciplines.org
(where the whole discussion is available) Seedless Grapes: Nature
and Culture. To appear in Stephen Laurence & Eric Margolis
(eds) Creations of the Mind: Theories of Artifacts and their
Representation,
|
|
|